wide-ranging definition of UMPCs but many, if not most others in the industry (and I might have to fall in line with this at some point) accept UMPCs as mobile desktop computers. Professional devices that give you the desktop operating system in a mini tablet or mini laptop form factor. In 2007, Intel talked about the Ultra Mobile market and introduced a mobile-optimised CPU aimed at enabling it. They also promised CPUs that would be designed from the ground up for mobile computing and introduced the term MID which was seen as a sub-UMPC by most people. The hope for many UMPC fans was that the new CPU would be much more powerful than 'Stealey' and would enable real Vista-capable 'pro-mobile' UMPCs. That was never really part of the plan for Menlow and after this week, its very clear where the focus is now. Menlow/Atom is a platform designed to be cheap and power-efficient above everything else. Cheap means small. Small means less space for transistors. Less transistors means less processing capability! 

The reason Atom needs to be cheap, small and power efficient is that it will be 1) going into tiny devices that need tiny motherboards and small batteries. 2) Will go into consumer electronics that won't bear any increases in component cost. 3) Relies on millions and millions of sales to stimulate the device into being the de-facto solution for all consumer internet-capable appliances and gadgets, mobile or not.

UMPCs are not seen by Intel as consumer gadgets that sell multi-millions and therefore Atom is not designed for them. Atom will scale up to productivity devices but it won't return any significant processing power advantages. The target for the Atom concept is the smartphone, not the 7" Vista device. It might take another generation to get to the smartphone but that's where they are heading with this.

If you're a traditional Origami/UMPC follower looking for a more powerful, longer battery life device, you need to forget Atom and take encouragement from the devices appearing with the ULV laptop parts. Having played with the Q1 Ultra Premium and seen nearly 6 hours battery life after doing a video encoding exercise and knowing that it isn't going to cost much more than the existing models I feel certain that as the new wave of processors from both Intel and VIA are engineered into lower clockrate, ultra low voltage parts, there's going to be some very good opportunities to make UMPCs that are far more powerful and far more portable than the devices of 2006 and 2007.

Tags: , ,
' /> wide-ranging definition of UMPCs but many, if not most others in the industry (and I might have to fall in line with this at some point) accept UMPCs as mobile desktop computers. Professional devices that give you the desktop operating system in a mini tablet or mini laptop form factor. In 2007, Intel talked about the Ultra Mobile market and introduced a mobile-optimised CPU aimed at enabling it. They also promised CPUs that would be designed from the ground up for mobile computing and introduced the term MID which was seen as a sub-UMPC by most people. The hope for many UMPC fans was that the new CPU would be much more powerful than 'Stealey' and would enable real Vista-capable 'pro-mobile' UMPCs. That was never really part of the plan for Menlow and after this week, its very clear where the focus is now. Menlow/Atom is a platform designed to be cheap and power-efficient above everything else. Cheap means small. Small means less space for transistors. Less transistors means less processing capability! 

The reason Atom needs to be cheap, small and power efficient is that it will be 1) going into tiny devices that need tiny motherboards and small batteries. 2) Will go into consumer electronics that won't bear any increases in component cost. 3) Relies on millions and millions of sales to stimulate the device into being the de-facto solution for all consumer internet-capable appliances and gadgets, mobile or not.

UMPCs are not seen by Intel as consumer gadgets that sell multi-millions and therefore Atom is not designed for them. Atom will scale up to productivity devices but it won't return any significant processing power advantages. The target for the Atom concept is the smartphone, not the 7" Vista device. It might take another generation to get to the smartphone but that's where they are heading with this.

If you're a traditional Origami/UMPC follower looking for a more powerful, longer battery life device, you need to forget Atom and take encouragement from the devices appearing with the ULV laptop parts. Having played with the Q1 Ultra Premium and seen nearly 6 hours battery life after doing a video encoding exercise and knowing that it isn't going to cost much more than the existing models I feel certain that as the new wave of processors from both Intel and VIA are engineered into lower clockrate, ultra low voltage parts, there's going to be some very good opportunities to make UMPCs that are far more powerful and far more portable than the devices of 2006 and 2007.

Tags: , ,
' />

Intel, Atom and the UMPC. The short story.

Posted on 09 March 2008, Last updated on 25 May 2015 by

I’m working on a detailed report about Atom and the mobile computing market right now but its going to take a few more days to finish it so I wanted to put something brief out there for people interested in UMPCs. Many of you know that I have a wide-ranging definition of UMPCs but many, if not most others in the industry (and I might have to fall in line with this at some point) accept UMPCs as mobile desktop computers. Professional devices that give you the desktop operating system in a mini tablet or mini laptop form factor. In 2007, Intel talked about the Ultra Mobile market and introduced a mobile-optimised CPU aimed at enabling it. They also promised CPUs that would be designed from the ground up for mobile computing and introduced the term MID which was seen as a sub-ultra mobile PC by most people. The hope for many ultra mobile PC fans was that the new CPU would be much more powerful than ‘Stealey’ and would enable real Vista-capable ‘pro-mobile’ UMPCs. That was never really part of the plan for Menlow and after this week, its very clear where the focus is now. Menlow/Atom is a platform designed to be cheap and power-efficient above everything else. Cheap means small. Small means less space for transistors. Less transistors means less processing capability! 

The reason Atom needs to be cheap, small and power efficient is that it will be 1) going into tiny devices that need tiny motherboards and small batteries. 2) Will go into consumer electronics that won’t bear any increases in component cost. 3) Relies on millions and millions of sales to stimulate the device into being the de-facto solution for all consumer internet-capable appliances and gadgets, mobile or not.

UMPCs are not seen by Intel as consumer gadgets that sell multi-millions and therefore Atom is not designed for them. Atom will scale up to productivity devices but it won’t return any significant processing power advantages. The target for the Atom concept is the smartphone, not the 7″ Vista device. It might take another generation to get to the smartphone but that’s where they are heading with this.

If you’re a traditional Origami/ultra mobile PC follower looking for a more powerful, longer battery life device, you need to forget Atom and take encouragement from the devices appearing with the ULV laptop parts. Having played with the Q1 Ultra Premium and seen nearly 6 hours battery life after doing a video encoding exercise and knowing that it isn’t going to cost much more than the existing models I feel certain that as the new wave of processors from both Intel and VIA are engineered into lower clockrate, ultra low voltage parts, there’s going to be some very good opportunities to make UMPCs that are far more powerful and far more portable than the devices of 2006 and 2007.

Tags: umpc, , intel

Comments are closed.

Find ultra mobile PCs, Ultrabooks, Netbooks and handhelds PCs quickly using the following links:

Acer C740
11.6" Intel Celeron 3205U
Acer Aspire Switch 10
10.1" Intel Atom Z3745
HP Elitebook 820 G2
12.5" Intel Core i5 5300U
Acer Aspire E11 ES1
11.6" Intel Celeron N2840
Acer C720 Chromebook
11.6" Intel Celeron 2955U
ASUS Zenbook UX305
13.3" Intel Core M 5Y10a
Dell Latitude E7440
14" Intel Core i5-4200U
Lenovo Thinkpad X220
12.5" Intel Core i5
Acer Chromebook 11 CB3-131
11.6" Intel Celeron N2807
Lenovo Ideapad Flex 10
10.1" Intel Celeron N2806