I can’t believe how long it feels like it has been since HP announced their forthcoming tablet back in February. I suppose that’s just a side-effect of this fast paced world of technology.
HP has recently announced that the HP TouchPad will be available for pre-order on June 19th, and will be hitting the streets in the US on July 1st. A few days later, you’ll see it officially available in the UK, Ireland, France, and Germany, followed by Canada in mid-July. They’re also planning on taking it to Italy, Spain, Australia, Hong Kong, New Zealand, and Singapore later in the year.
Sounds like they’re doing a good job with wide distribution, but my primary concern is whether or not it’ll be able to stand up to the competition and secure a strong foothold in the market for future WebOS devices. So in this article, let’s have a look at the competition, and what the TouchPad hopes to bring to the field.
Pricing
The first thing we need to look at is price. HP’s biggest competitor right now is undoubtedly the iPad 2. Apple sells the iPad 2 (WiFi only) in 16/32/64GB options at $499, $599, and $699 respectively.
The TouchPad is coming out of the gate with an important characteristic; matching the iPad 2’s price. For the WiFi-only model, HP is offering 16/32GB versions at $499 and $599, but they’re lacking a 64GB option.
The TouchPad also won’t launch with 3G/4G models available, but we’ll see them at a later time.
Ideally, HP would have undercut the iPad, but with a level playing field in the price department, customers can begin to compare features. This is important as I think when put side-by-side with the iPad 2, customers are going to find some compelling reasons to go with the TouchPad.
Strengths
Despite being announced more than four months ago, the TouchPad boasts some impressive features that we haven’t seen on many (if any) devices to date. Let’s look at what the TouchPad is doing right:
Wireless Charging
Murmurs of wireless charging have been floating around as possible iPhone 5 features for some time now; Palm (now acquired by HP) has actually been doing it since the launch of their Pre smartphone.
HP is bringing that technology to the TouchPad by including the necessary hardware in the back of the device, and offering what they’re calling the ‘Touchstone’ dock as an accessory.
While wireless charging is certainly convenient, it’s important to realize that the Touchstone dock is sold separately and has still not been priced. Wireless charging would set it apart from the crowd, but if the Touchstone dock isn’t priced competitively, we may as well forget about the feature. I’m hoping to see the pricing for the dock come in under $100, ideally around $50, making it an easy add-on sell at the time of purchase.
This just in: HP has announced Touchstone dock pricing at $80. Not bad, but hopefully we’ll see it come down after launch or eventually be bundled as a bonus for a period of time.
Visual Multitasking
The TouchPad has a visually compelling multitasking interface. Using a card-style system, WebOS allows the user to flick through all of their currently running applications. Applications are not viewed as simple icons as in iOS, but rather as large cards that show the application in its current state.
Being able to see exactly what you were working on when deciding which application to switch back to is more valuable then it may seem. In iOS you have nothing but an icon in a recently used list to decided which applications to jump between. The problem being that some applications have redundant uses, so it can be difficult to remember exactly which application you need to return to.
For instance, if a friend shares a link on Facebook and I click on it in the Facebook app in iOS, that app will open the webpage within itself. If I switch to the Messages app to respond to a message then want to return to what I was doing, I have to remember that I was viewing a webpage inside the Facebook app, not the browser. Often times I’ll instinctively switch to the browser only to realize that I was actually viewing the website within Facebook. A visual representation of the app state would totally fix this problem, and that’s exactly what multitasking on the TouchPad will do.
Honeycomb does graphically represent multitasking apps in a limited way, but the view of other applications is relegated to a relatively small thumbnail which somewhat serves to defeat the visual functionality.
The BlackBerry Playbook is definitely the closest to the TouchPad when it comes to visual multitasking (and some might say that they borrowed quite a bit from WebOS’s multitasking scheme).
Being able to see your open apps before you start interacting with them is great, and WebOS also gives you the ability to stack related applications together to keep yourself organized.
And it’s easy to close applications… just flick them off the screen – a single gesture. To stop an application in the background on iOS, you have to double-tap the home button, then hold your finger on an icon until they shake, then tap the little X that appears at the top right of the icon. To close background applications in Android you have to press the back button until you back all the way out of the application, dig through the settings menu, or use a task manager.
Synergy
Synergy is embedded in WebOS and aims to keep all of your communication from various sources in order.
For messaging, SMS and IMs from the same person are shown in one threaded conversation. This has always intrigued me as a feature. On one hand it seems intuitive and useful, but on the other, I feel like you’d be majorly confusing the other party if you were responding to something they sent in IM through SMS, or vice versa.
You can sign is with a number of sources, such as Facebook, Google, and Exchange, and Synergy will consolidate your contacts and their information into single entities in your contacts list, and if you make changes on your phone, they’ll be reflected online automatically. You’ll also be able to get email from all of these sources in one inbox.
Synergy will pull calendars from these sources into a single view, and allow you to manage personal and work calendars easily. Once again, if you make adjustments to calendars on your phone, you’ll see their online counterpart adjusted as well.
For photos, Synergy will present your online albums right on your device as though they were local. HP says they’ve currently got support for Facebook, Photobucket, and Snapfish, though they’re obviously missing two major ones – Picasa and Flickr.
Apple’s iOS does some of the things that Synergy does, but Synergy is open to developers, which means there is potential for more services and more functionality than iOS allows for.
Phone+Tablet Functionality
This is probably the TouchPad’s strongest point, and it’s something that does not exist elsewhere on the market right now.
HP is going with the ‘better together’ mantra. You’ll be rewarded if you go with HP for both your tablet and smartphone needs, thanks to some tight integration between the upcoming Pre 3 (or Veer) and the TouchPad.
First, you’ll be able to pair the Pre 3 and TouchPad via Bluetooth and this will allow you to answer calls and receive and reply to SMS from the TouchPad. This is great because if you’re relaxing on the couch with your TouchPad, why should you have to get your phone (with a small screen) out of your pocket just to reply to a text? If you’ve got the big screen right with you, it seems to make much more sense to use it, and with the TouchPad, that’s possible.
Then there’s a particularly cool parlor trick that you’ll be able to pull using the Pre 3 (or Veer!) and the TouchPad. If you’re browsing a website on your TouchPad but you’ve got to run out the door, you can easily just touch the Pre 3 to the tablet and, voila, the website will be automatically transferred from the tablet to the phone. This will work between tablet and phone or between phone and tablet.
This relatively simple trick is going to ‘wow’ non-techies with it’s simplicity, and hopefully HP will extend this functionality to allow you to send any number of items between devices, from photos to maps.
Free for Devs
It’s free to begin developing for WebOS which is certainly attractive for small developers, who would otherwise have to pay a $99 iOS developer fee.
This is good for attracting the little guys but probably doesn’t have much of an impact on larger companies who will be more worried about a larger user base to distribute to rather than the existence or non-existence of a relatively small fee.
Printing
This one tends to be overlooked when it comes to tablets, but if you’re looking for a productivity device, the ability to print can be a key feature.
Because HP is one of the largest printer manufacturers, they’ve been able to built in wireless printing support for their massive connected-printer ecosystem directly into WebOS.
Weaknesses
As we can see, the TouchPad has a lot going for it in the features department. That doesn’t mean it’s perfect however. There are some roadblocks in the way to it becoming a major player the tablet market.
Content
HP is a big company, but currently, Apple is king of content, and Google looks to be hot on their heels with some recently announced content partnerships.
HP says that the TouchPad will be great for digital publishing, but it’s unclear whether or not they currently have the relationships necessary to compete with Apple’s iBooks and upcoming Newsstand.
Music and video is an even more challenging place for the TouchPad. HP doesn’t have an existing music or video marketplace from which users could purchase content. This means that users will need to find content elsewhere, all the while leaving HP without a cut of profits from content that might have been sold through a store of their own.
Connectors and Memory
This is a particularly troubling area for the TouchPad. The device is extremely barebones when it comes to connectors. In fact, the only connectors on the device are a single micro-USB port and a 3.5mm headphone jack.
There’s no full-sized USB, micro-SD slot, or HDMI.
HDMI is particularly troubling as the TouchPad will be one of the only tablets without this feature. Nearly every Nvidia Tegra 2 based device features some form of display output, and even the iPad 2 can do 1080p display mirroring wirelessly or with an HDMI adapter.
Because the TouchPad doesn’t have a dock connector, there’s no room for adapter accessories (unless they are wireless, but they’d be slow BT 2.1 connections), and this could be a major problem for people who want to be able to output videos and presentations at work, or share movies and pictures at home.
Then there’s the fact that HP is only offering the TouchPad in 16/32GB iterations with no slots for memory expansion.
When potential customers look at the TouchPad next to devices like the Asus Eee Pad Transformer, which can handle pretty much any USB device that you might throw at it, and has support for expandable memory, the TouchPad’s paltry connector and memory options will certainly leave much to be desired.
Performance
Despite all of the great features, the TouchPad is unlikely to succeed if it doesn’t stack up when it comes to performance.
Performance will be derived from a combination of hardware capabilities and optimized software, so let’s take a look:
Apple’s iPad 2 is using their custom A4 CPU along with a PowerVR SGX 543MP2. Most 10” Honeycomb devices are using the current industry standard – Nvidia’s Tegra 2.
The WiFi-only version of the TouchPad, on the other hand, is using a Qualcomm Snapdragon APQ8060 dual-core CPU which runs at 1.2GHz (the future 3G/4G versions will likely use the MSM8x60 which has support for 3G/4G modems). The GPU is Qualcomm’s Adreno 220, which will offer over 4x performance when compared to the Adreno 200 GPU which is already found on devices that use the Snapdragon QSD8x50, according to Qualcomm. They also claim the the Adreno 220 will offer “console quality” graphics, but that’s very loosely defined terminology.
Qualcomm says that their APQ8060 will be able to handle 1080p video playback and capture (though the latter doesn’t matter because the TouchPad lacks a rear camera, and the front cam isn’t high resolution enough for 1080p capture). Accelerated video codecs include MPEG-4, MPEG-2, H.264, H.263, VC-1, DivX, WMV-9, Sorenson Spark, and VP6.
No other consumer device has yet been shipped with the APQ8060, but Qualcomm says that the CPU will provide a 60% increase in performance and lower power consumption than standard ARM A9 dual-core CPUs that have been seen in a number of recent devices. That stat may only be valid when the APQ8060 is clocked to its maximum 1.5GHz, however, HP is only clocking the TouchPad to 1.2GHz (likely for heat and battery life balance).
Clocking to 1.2GHz means that they’ve got some room to play with the speed down the road, and we may see a bump in clock speed at a later date, to keep the performance competitive (as we’ve seen Apple do with their iPod Touch line).
Qualcomm claims that the real advantage is the asynchronous design of the APQ8060’s two cores, which allows for each core to be clocked and powered independently. They say that this will lead to large power savings over competing chips, but the CPU is now a relatively small part of the overall power footprint – the TouchPad’s large screen is likely to be the biggest energy drainer in the system.
When it comes down to it, these figures won’t mean much unless the software is optimized to take advantage of the features afforded by the CPU and GPU. However, it doesn’t seem as though the TouchPad will be coming out of the gate underpowered, which is definitely a good thing; it could possibly lead the pack until we start seeing Nvidia Kal-El devices which are slated to begin production in August.
App Catalog & Developer Traction
HP’s application store is officially dubbed the App Catalog. Though it has been existence since June of 2009, the App Catalog has less than 7000 applications, according to Pre Central. The vast majority of which are designed for WebOS phones, not tablets.
This is in comparison to the Android Marketplace’s 200,000+ apps and Apple’s App Store which has 425,000+ apps.
An app store can make or break a platform, and building one from the ground-up, when the competition has such an insane lead, is tough.
Numbers of apps matter little to consumers, as long as the major apps are there, but in order for major apps to be created for the platform, you need developers.
No matter how popular the TouchPad is when it launches, it’s got a long way to go before reaching a similar customer base for app developers (a major factor when a developer decides which platforms to create apps for).
And because HP uses the same revenue share for developers as iOS and Android (70% of an app sale goes to the developer, 30% to the company), there is almost no incentive for a developer to create a WebOS application before an iOS or Android application when the customer base of the latter two is so much larger.
Brand
HP is a big company and they are certainly well recognized, but definitely not for tablets or mobile operating systems. Marketing is going to have to convince the mainstream that the HP TouchPad isn’t a “me too” move, but rather that the device and the ecosystem has a serious plan backing it up (along with a future roadmap).
While iOS and Android are now more or less household names, WebOS is practically unheard of in the mainstream. Combine that with the fact that HP isn’t known as a company that manufacturers tablets (or even mobile devices in general) and you’ll see that HP is looking at an uphill battle when appealing to non-techies.
HP is in a peculiar position because they are in the middleground of a model that once only had two extremes. Let me explain:
Apple uses a closed-ecosystem approach and they’re known for doing it extremely well. From their OS to their devices, everything is in Apple’s control.
Android uses a open-ecosystem in which OEMs are welcome to create numerous devices, and developers have way more freedom in creating software for the platform.
Now here comes HP with WebOS and a closed-ecosystem approach but the difference between them and Apple is that HP doesn’t have a proven track-record for making that model work.
So when a customer looks at the options, it seems likely that they’ll either go the open-ecosystem, or go with the well established closed-ecosystem – Apple.
HP is going to have to work to convince people that their closed-ecosystem model is as good, if not superior to Apple’s, if they want mainstream consumer adoption.
Honestly I think there’s a good chance that we’ll eventually see third-party WebOS devices if HP is unable to tempt people away from one closed-ecosystem (iOS) to another.
Wrapping it Up
All and all, the TouchPad will be walking out the door on the 1st of July with a decent chance to succeed.
They’ve hit the all important iPad 2 price-point and they are some really neat features to temp people toward this new player in the tablet market. On top of that, the Snapdragon CPU that the TouchPad is launching with should provide ample performance that is on par if not somewhat better than what we’re seeing on existing tablets.
The biggest threats to the TouchPad, in my opinion, are the lack of connectors, a weak App Catalogue, and forthcoming Kal-El based Honeycomb tablets.
In my mind, I see HP releasing a TouchPad 1.5 sometime around 6 months after the TouchPad is released that adds some important ports and to bump the performance to compete with Kal-El devices and the iPad 3 – this ‘1.5’ device could come along with a 7” version of the tablet.
What are the features that you are most looking forward to from the TouchPad? Which of it’s weaknesses concern you the most? I’d be very interested to know in the comments.
>>>Combine that with the fact that HP isn’t known as a company that manufacturers tablets (or even mobile devices in general) and you’ll see that HP is looking at an uphill battle when appealing to non-techies.
Um, wut? HP had Pocket PCs. They were the first with HPCs. They single-handedly upgraded the netbook market when they entered it too.
Maybe that’s a case of “That was then, this is now” or “But what have you done for me lately,” but I still think you’re underestimating HP here and not given them their due.
Definitely a case of “that was then, this is now.” Of course among us we know HP as the maker of the Pocket PC, but I’m really talking about non-techies. If I surveyed 20 of my nearest friends (including the ones that are fairly computer literate), I can almost guarantee not one of them would know who was responsible for Pocket PCs, let alone what they were. This is including a number of friends who own Android and iOS devices.
Not to mention the beautiful TC1000 and TC1100 convertible tablets on Windows XP Tablet Edition. I was asked a few times in 05/06 when I was using my TC1000 whether it was an Apple product… ;-)
Oh, I owned a TC1100 back in 2004. I still remember that gadget as one on my favorites. Great desing. My daughter, when she was two, used it too to learn to draw. Great memories.
I’m sorry, but this device is DOA. Tech geeks (like many of us) might be impressed by the hardware and some of the GUI improvements, but in the end the issue will always be CONTENT.
I am very interested in new technology and competition, but without a catalog of solid applications I see this product to be DOA. If HP wants a fighting chance in this market they will have to market this at a price point that increases volume and encourages developers. I would say it need to be at least $150 cheaper to attract sufficient volume in sales. And with all the new Android tablets coming to market, the challenge to be the low cost product won’t get any easier.
Sorry HP, but despite my love of new gadgets, I just can’t imagine why I would want to buy one of these.
Have to agree with some of your comments here. For me, the deal killer is no ports for memory expansion, or even for getting content, like music or videos, onto the device. I don’t to have to plug in into my PC to do this, and I don’t want to wait for wireless transfers – if that’s even an option. A lot of what I do is take pictures or videos with my camera and just want to pop out the card and load them onto my tablet or PC.
The second thing is the price. This is WAY too expensive for the lack of apps and the weight versus the iPad2. I agree that the price for a 16gb WiFi-only should be at $400. $450 for 32gb.
I don’t agree that its DOA, though. For me, I am only interested in reading books, playing videos, checking email, and surfing the web. All the other stuff I can do on my Android phone. I like the user interface here very much, though I am concerned about lagginess. I’m not saying there will be any, but… I definitely want to make sure it has NONE, because that is another deal breaker.
Main concern are ports. I use my iPad2 as productivity tool so I run presentations and use QuickOffice for light documents on the road. I user Dropbox to keep all synchronized. Although I use Apple stuff my calendar, notes, tasks, contacts and email is in Google cloud.
When the TouchPad was announced and they told QuickOffice was included in the package and they talk about perfect integration with Dropbox and Google’s cloud I think I was a lucky guy and said OK TouchPad + Pre3 will be my replace for my current iPhone4 + iPad2. Reason? I hate Apple’s artificial limitations to their gadgets like limitations on Bluetooth sharing and the sandboxing concept that makes me to have 3 times a file in the iPad if I want to use it with 3 different apps.
But suddenly, while I’m waiting for the TouchPad I read in your post about the lack of ports like USB host, SD card reader and video output and that demolish my view of TouchPad as better productivity tool than my current iPad.
That makes me to turn my eyes back to Android stuff. I don’t like honeycomb because it’s problems with crashes and all the troubles with trojan horses and malware in the Android Market, but… I really need and improved productivity tablet (forget about tabletPC… I used then back in 2003-2007). Asus Transformer or the Atrix + laptop docking looks cool to me again.
You gave me horrible news today, pal.
Great write up, Ben. I was going to write one, but now I think about just posting a link to yours.
The Hardware: I absolutely agree here. It is a huge dissapointment, that HP didn´t opt for more connectivity options. No HDMI really kills some usage cases. USB OTG / Host would have been nice too, but I don´t think it´s that crucial. I really don´t understand why no tablet manufaturer manages an SD card reader (not speaking of µSD here) into their tablet. Many of us still use SD Cards in our cameras, as they are still cheaper at large sizes / high speeds – especially with a 3G equipped tablet (BTW: Why no 3g on launch, HP?) this is really bad. The manufaturers could easily include such a slot in a manner that the upselling still worked (sticking out SD) – and still would be appreciated.
The Price. I totally agree with HP, that a too aggressive pricing would have implied that the TouchPad was an inferior product. Setting the exact same price is a huge mistake though, as the TouchPad will be perceived by many as the inferior product. It is heavier (740g) and thicker (13.7mm) and we don´t know yet, how fast and fluid it will feel: Many customers will notice that it is a first generation product. Add the lack of an video out option and the fewer apps and content deals to it, and you find out that the TouchPad is actually an inferior product. Setting a high price point will not hide this. And we haven´t even added in the fact that Apples products are way more hyped than HPs will ever be in the next three years.
Another note on the App situation: One has to keep in mind that webOS 3.0, which is launched with the TouchPad, breaks compatibility to the older apps, as the old Mojo apps will only run inside an emulator with a virtual gesture area. From what I read in my twitter timeline, the new development kit called Enyo is great, even though it´s not as close to web development as Mojo was. Almost all of the apps I use on my Pre Plus (which I love, btw) will be available in a native flavour on the TouchPads launch.
Than there is one more thing I want to point out: From what I sneeked from all these videos about the TouchPad I´ve watched, it won´t be as great as on a webOS phone. While dumping the gesture area (all ways I can imagine to implement it one a tablet have flaws) is not necessarily a bad thing (as many first time users of the webOS phones didn´t understand the concept of it at first, anyway), there is something that I consider a mayor caveat. Apparently, there is no way to swipe from one way to another without going back to card mode, and even worse, to get to card mode, you have to press this one (I think it´s capacitive) button, which is always at one point. The Android guys did a better job at that, and the (in terms of user experience) webOS rip off TabletOS/QNX does a better job there, too.
(Oh, this became lenghty. I´ll make this a blog post at LINMOB ;-) )
Good thoughts here, Peter. Thanks for the link on your blog as well!
What about Beats Audio? I think that´s one of its biggest strengths. It has no video output, but it has great audio. I thought hp was targeting its corporate clients. At first glance, a great audio output sounds more like a home device than like a corporate one. Looks like hp has to leverage its wireless environment idea and start selling wlan projectors – that would solve the video output issue. =)
And honestly, who needs SD if you have everything on the cloud… I don´t see much future in such media storage devices. For data transfer between devices you say? You have wlan and bt, and honestly: people should start automatically syncing all their data on the cloud.
But again: what do you think about Beats Audio?
Sure I will MBP, as soon as…
… my camera get wifi/3G and sychronization with the could. In the meantime we need SD slots in the gadgets.
With my current solution I got the Apple Camera Kit in order to be able to connect my camera with the iPad. So I need a better solution if I buy a TouchPad… SD slot could be a better solution, but as a matter of fact connecting my camera to the TouchPad will be even more difficult (impossible) than with the iPad.
Mahjong, of course i get your point. I just hoped you would get mine. I meant you don´t ACTUALLY need a portable data storage device – your phone is one, with limitless cloud storage. Apple was known for connectivity between their devices – through hardware. Palm bet on wireless – with the touchstone, cloud aso. Apple is now betting on wireless too.
I see the future also wireless – and NOW. Don´t mean to sound rude – but there are lots of wifi cameras in the market. There are wifi projectors. Wifi speakers – you name it. hp should right now be offering also all kinds of devices: wireless and running webos =)
Sure there are MBP, but don’t expect I buy a new camera just because HP decided to save money by not installing an SD card slot and a HDMI output. OK I can afford buying a new camera, but I cannot force my enterprise to change all the proyectors and LCD in meeting rooms or even in our clients.
No, nowadays HDMI, VGA or any other video output is a must have.
On storage? OK I could understand your point.
You may be interested to know that I purposefully didn’t including any information about Beats audio (though in hindsight, perhaps I should have explained why).
I didn’t mention it because they have announced no specific information, that I could find, that said specifically what it would entail. The issue being that marking a product as having “Beats Audio” could mean that HP is integrating high-quality audio hardware, or it could be as silly as them applying an unchangeable equalizer setting to the output.
Not only is the Beats certification ambiguous, but Apple’s products tend to have very good audio output capabilities (give a high quality source). Honestly I don’t think that any enhancement that HP could make to the audio hardware or settings on the device would make it sound better than any of Apple’s device’s to the average consumer (which will be the vast majority of customers). Perhaps some best-in-class audio hardware could appeal to audiophiles, but the success of the iPod/iPhone/iPad tells you that the audio quality that Apple provides out of their devices is good enough for the mainstream.
Whatever the case, I’ll definitely be giving the TouchPad a thorough audio trail and comparison to other devices with my Astro A40’s.
Nice review and some great additional comments here.
Noting the shortcomings of this 1st-gen tablet for webOS, how likely is it to change significantly for the better in the next one or two design upgrades? If this were still under Palm, I would not be optimistic, but under HP and the enterprise push they are undertaking for webOS, they’ll have to be responsive to that arena. Does that make hardware changes such as SD cards, HDMI connections, etc., more likely?
All in all, this seems like a decent launch. I’ve been using a Pre for two years and was looking forward to an expansion of the webOS ecosystem. I’ll probably pass on this 1st-gen device, but I am hopeful for significant improvements coming soon.
If HP really wants people to adapt this for enterprise like people once did with their Pocket PC line, they are going to need to add display-out, some form of memory stick, and perhaps even a full sized USB slot.
Devices like the Acer Iconia A500 and Eee Pad Transformer already have HDMI-out and full sized USB ports with compatibility for a huge range of USB devices which makes them far more flexible in an enterprise scenario (something you absolutely need in that environment!)
When the TouchPad was announced, Honeycomb devices were not yet available in mass quantities and HP was clearly modelling the TouchPad off of the original iPad at the time. I think that HP will need to react with a TouchPad update to add some of those vital ports, and they may also find that a 7″ device is desired by their customer base.
Just to be clear, the Veer does not support the “touch to share” feature, just the Pre3. I am personally very excited about the TouchPad. you can’t beat the WebOS interface and on the TouchPad, even better.
Just fyi: the veer is supposed to get an ota update to support touch to share. That´s why I can´t make up my mind between the pre3 and the veer =)
Really? Do you have a Pre (+,2)? I have, and I don´t want a smaller screen. I think the Pre³ will have a great size – I am trying to use a SGSII right now and feel like: “Slightly too large.” I´ve got an Acer Stream (Nexus One clone) and like its size, only the screen could be a little more dense or be slightly bigger in comparison to the size of the actual device. The Pre³ seems to be pretty ok and is in my humble opinion the most interesting device announced back in february. I only wonder when (or if?) there will be Enyo for the webOS smartphones.
That’s the advantage of choices – people can have the smartphone OS architecture and phone size they wish to use. If you have choices of physical KB or no KB, slab or slider, 4.5″ to 3″ size screens – great, pick the one that works best for you. The world should be big enough to accommodate all the needs, rather than a one size fits all determined by one person or one group.
You´re right, Jim. I was in between a Veer-in-pocket/notifications-on-wristwatch/touchpad-as-UI combo. But a powerful, big screen phone to play with plus a bigger screen – touchpad – sounds also interesting. In the first scenario, you should carry your touchpad with you, in the second one, you just need your phone.
btw i have a pre minus, and you´re right, for playing with it I DEFINITELY don´t want a smaller screen either =)
I have a Pre2 and a Veer. Finding myself using the Veer mostly due to just being able to throw in the pocket and forget about it. I also found, surprisingly, that it seems easier to type on due to the raised keys. I did not think that I would like it but pleasantly surprised.
While well written, the quality of the thoughts and content in this “look” is incomprehensibly bad. I think my feed-load is about to get a little more manageable.
I won’t touch any tablet that doesn’t have a Kindle app. This is the Blackberry Playback all over again with slightly better sales. HP should allow developers to keep 90% instead of only 30%.
I believe the Kindle app is going to be available. At least that’s what I read somewhere last night… But I agree; without it, for get selling any of these things.